I know I posted up some more spells for the wizard ages back, but I’m looking at one of them again, and wondering…

I know I posted up some more spells for the wizard ages back, but I’m looking at one of them again, and wondering…

I know I posted up some more spells for the wizard ages back, but I’m looking at one of them again, and wondering… 

would a spell that deals a set amount of damage to a random number of targets (rather than the fireball’s random damage to a predictable but situationally variable number of targets) be… I dunno, an acceptable thing? 

13 thoughts on “I know I posted up some more spells for the wizard ages back, but I’m looking at one of them again, and wondering…”

  1. tossing up whether it should be “1d3 targets”, or “1d3 enemies of the GM’s choice”. Each would rather change how accurate the spell is. 

  2. Possibly, yes. The Fireball is not universally useful because it can’t be used in close quarters. Sleep is not universally useful because not everything sleeps, and sleeping things can be woken up easily. 

    I’m trying to come up with another spell that is similarly useful… but not universally so.

Comments are closed.