Advanced Moves that do extra damage, like Smite or Merciless…these apply to dealing damage via the Defend move as…

Advanced Moves that do extra damage, like Smite or Merciless…these apply to dealing damage via the Defend move as…

Advanced Moves that do extra damage, like Smite or Merciless…these apply to dealing damage via the Defend move as well, correct?

10 thoughts on “Advanced Moves that do extra damage, like Smite or Merciless…these apply to dealing damage via the Defend move as…”

  1. You’d need to be above [0.5 class damage] for that.  So a level 6 Paladin.  And this ain’t DnD 4 or anything; “average” isn’t as big of a deal when nothing has 100+ HP.

  2. Does this become a problem? I mean, does Defending become tactically superior to H&S at some point, so players will just constantly Defend?

  3. I don’t think it is a problem because when you defend, then you usually do that in lieu of something else.

    A Wizard that doesn’t cast spells isn’t a very fictionally efficient Wizard, and the wizard is the only one to have a d4 for damage.

    The Cleric follows the same logic, Bards can’t defend themselves and boost his allies at the same time, and the Druid either defends or spends his hold. Either way, all classes that has a d6 or worse can usually do better than deal [level] damage.

    That’s how I see it at least.

  4. Tim Franzke Well, I think it’s generally better to let the individual group decide on these things.

    Also, I really see no problem with this, as it kind of rewards players for having a high constitution for classes that aren’t close combat monsters.

    I see no problem with letting a bard play a flute while dodging around an enemy combatant.

    Fan of the characters and all. Don’t punish them for using the abilities that make their characters cool 🙂

    EDIT: Made a “there they’re their” mistake!

Comments are closed.